2008 Woodie Awards
notes from the desk: Get involved, don't just criticize
Anthony Adragna
Issue date: 10/10/07 Section: Opinions
- Page 1 of 2 next >
If I could count the number of reasons students give for remaining apathetic towards social life, I'd be counting for days. The biggest complaint at Midd is that there is never enough to do or that the activities that are available stink. But the vast majority of students do nothing for social life, except complain about it and blame those who are in charge of organizing activities.
It would be different if there were no opportunities for students to have an impact of their social lives. But there are. We just don't take advantage of them.
The commons exist primarily to offer students the chance to create ideas for social events and see them executed. Each commons has around $20,000 to spend annually on student ideas. No idea is too lofty. Or so the commons say.
And yet, the reality is that the vast majority of students have no say in how that money is spent. Commons Councils are attended by at most 40 students a week, and that is the exception to the rule. Most commons see attendance hovering around 10. That means that fewer than 10 percent of students have any say in how commons programming evolves, in the best of scenarios.
With such limited input it seems logical, if not inevitable, that many students are unhappy with what commons produce in terms of programming. Students who currently attend Council cannot encompass the wide ranges of interests that exist on campus. But don't blame the organizers. Those who don't like the programming should come change it.
The same thing goes for MCAB, which always catches a lot of flack for the decisions they make regarding campus-wide programming. Criticism abounds, be it for Pub Nights, comedian selections or the band choice for the spring show.
MCAB has literally hundreds of thousands of dollars to spend on programming. The body welcomes and encourages student involvement in selecting programs by offering open, public forums for discussing potential bands, comedians and events. Few go.
It would be different if there were no opportunities for students to have an impact of their social lives. But there are. We just don't take advantage of them.
The commons exist primarily to offer students the chance to create ideas for social events and see them executed. Each commons has around $20,000 to spend annually on student ideas. No idea is too lofty. Or so the commons say.
And yet, the reality is that the vast majority of students have no say in how that money is spent. Commons Councils are attended by at most 40 students a week, and that is the exception to the rule. Most commons see attendance hovering around 10. That means that fewer than 10 percent of students have any say in how commons programming evolves, in the best of scenarios.
With such limited input it seems logical, if not inevitable, that many students are unhappy with what commons produce in terms of programming. Students who currently attend Council cannot encompass the wide ranges of interests that exist on campus. But don't blame the organizers. Those who don't like the programming should come change it.
The same thing goes for MCAB, which always catches a lot of flack for the decisions they make regarding campus-wide programming. Criticism abounds, be it for Pub Nights, comedian selections or the band choice for the spring show.
MCAB has literally hundreds of thousands of dollars to spend on programming. The body welcomes and encourages student involvement in selecting programs by offering open, public forums for discussing potential bands, comedians and events. Few go.
Be the first to comment on this story